HackerPapers

arXiv:1804.06655cs.CV

Deep Face Recognition: A Survey

Mei Wang, Weihong Deng

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Deep learning applies multiple processing layers to learn representations of data with multiple levels of feature extraction. This emerging technique has reshaped the research landscape of face recognition (FR) since 2014, launched by the breakthroughs of DeepFace and DeepID. Since then, deep learning technique, characterized by the hierarchical architecture to stitch together pixels into invariant face representation, has dramatically improved the state-of-the-art performance and fostered successful real-world applications. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the recent developments on deep FR, covering broad topics on algorithm designs, databases, protocols, and application scenes. First, we summarize different network architectures and loss functions proposed in the rapid evolution of the deep FR methods. Second, the related face processing methods are categorized into two classes: "one-to-many augmentation" and "many-to-one normalization". Then, we summarize and compare the commonly used databases for both model training and evaluation. Third, we review miscellaneous scenes in deep FR, such as cross-factor, heterogenous, multiple-media and industrial scenes. Finally, the technical challenges and several promising directions are highlighted.

arXiv comments
Neurocomputing
Journal reference
Neurocomputing, 2021, 429:215-244
DOI
doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.081
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jun 2019 to Jun 2019.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • If a widespread facial recognition system were deployed, the false positive rate would probably be a lot greater than would be acceptable. For what it's worth, this paper I found claims that humans are 97.53% accurate, whereas one particular deep learning algorithm was 99.80%…

      pizzaView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.