<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Frustratingly Easy Meta-Embedding -- Computing Meta-Embeddings by Averaging Source Word Embeddings · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1804.05262/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1804.05262/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Frustratingly Easy Meta-Embedding -- Computing Meta-Embeddings by Averaging Source Word Embeddings — mentioned by XTXinverseXTY</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49837725</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1804.05262:49837725</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 22:38:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hard to separate the memorability of the abstract from the underlying material. IMO the most memorable papers contain some unexpected simplification: a complicated problem turns out to reduce to something much simpler [0], perhaps for a counterintuitive reason [1]. So a memorable abstract should advertise that the paper contains some cute little trick. This may not help you actually publish though [0]: Attack the RLHF problem with a simple classification loss: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290 [1]: Frustratingly Easy Meta-Embeddings: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05262&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1804.05262/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
