In Defense of a "Single-World" Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics · HackerPapers discussions

In Defense of a "Single-World" Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics — mentioned by kgwgk

Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:42:57 GMT

>> your claim that the QM description is not correct > That's not my claim. My claim is that the change in the mathematical description of Bob's particles (from mixed states to pure states) when Alice measures her particles does not correspond to any actual physical change in Bob's particles. Well, according to quantum mechanics there is a physical change when Alice measures her particles because: before Alice's measurement => the pair "A/B" is entangled after Alice's measurement => the pair "A/B" is not entangled According to you alternative description, is the pair A/B entangled or not…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

In Defense of a "Single-World" Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics — mentioned by kgwgk

Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:27:27 GMT

There was some discussion about that paper here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18023452 I think it's much less interesting than it seems at first sight. Related (and clearer): In Defense of a "Single-World" Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Jeffrey Bub) https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03267

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

In Defense of a "Single-World" Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics — HN submission

Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:02:35 GMT

In Defense of a “Single-World” Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.