YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement · HackerPapers discussions

YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement — mentioned by derekpankaew

Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:09:10 GMT

YOLO v3's paper is hilarious. The model was state of the art at the time, yet it's written in a tongue-in-cheek way: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.02767.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement — HN submission

Thu, 07 May 2020 15:33:42 GMT

YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement — mentioned by mikehollinger

Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:30:44 GMT

My favorite (in terms of dark humor, if we’re honest) is YOLO, one of the more interesting deep learning object detectors. [1] It is the exact opposite of yours in every way. The code is brilliant however. Even the papers are snarky. [2] [1] https://github.com/pjreddie/darknet/commits/master [2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.02767.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement — mentioned by geofft

Tue, 02 Apr 2019 19:19:52 GMT

The YOLOv3 paper is pretty delightful: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.02767.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement — mentioned by stared

Wed, 30 Jan 2019 22:42:00 GMT

When I see a title with possibly overblown philosophical implications, I get cautious. When I see "Max Tegmark", it is a sign to close a tab. While science, in general, suffers from overblowing implications (as in promising that given research revolutionizes everything, etc - to get credit and the next grant), he is an ace of that. To contrast it with "YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement" https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02767 in which the author goes to the other extreme, being bluntly honest.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.