<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Should China build the Great Collider? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1804.00682/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1804.00682/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Should China build the Great Collider? — mentioned by cma</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33016330</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1804.00682:33016330</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 04:26:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Opps yeah, was mixing it up with CERN in general. All the work on WWW and earlier hypertext there wasn&amp;#x27;t just for early LHC planning stuff but it has been a noted thing: &amp;gt; Should China build the Great Collider? &amp;gt; Stephen Hawking and Gordon Kane 2018 &amp;gt; [...] &amp;gt; This has shown up in the past from the LHC in a number of well documented areas, including inventing the World Wide Web with its huge impact on economies world-wide and then grid computing. Someone said imagine that CERN (where the World Wide Web was invented for particle physics) had one penny for each use, then particle physics would…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1804.00682/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
