<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Generalized Riemann Hypothesis and Stochastic Time Series · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.10223/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.10223/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Generalized Riemann Hypothesis and Stochastic Time Series — mentioned by credit_guy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29332408</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1803.10223:29332408</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:18:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a problem. You are a journalist. It&amp;#x27;s a bit quiet out there. Not much to report on. You see that someone wrote an article 3 years ago [1] about the Riemann hypothesis. They didn&amp;#x27;t prove it, of course, they just showed some linkage with some physical phenomena. How do you turn this into a nice title that can generate clicks? If you say &amp;quot;proven&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;solved&amp;quot;, that&amp;#x27;s a straight lie, you can&amp;#x27;t do that. If you say &amp;quot;explored&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;investigated&amp;quot;, nobody&amp;#x27;s going to pay any attention. How about &amp;quot;unveiled&amp;quot;? Yep, I think &amp;quot;unveil&amp;quot; is quite optimal for the situation. Can you find a better one? [1]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.10223/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
