The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter · HackerPapers discussions

The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter — mentioned by mikhailfranco

Wed, 26 Jul 2023 06:11:47 GMT

Neil Turok has recently proposed cosmological models based purely on the existing Standard Model with sterile right-handed neutrinos. No new forms of Dark Matter required. One RH neutrino must be massless, and another must be 4.8 x 10^8 GeV. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter — mentioned by lamontcg

Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:23:27 GMT

> It's quite tiresome to read the same objections as if physicists somehow hadn't thought of them. Okay now do climate change and climatologists. And most people just don't bother to read the article at all it seems. No better than reddit. Changing gears, though, and trying to be more useful, if you want more coverage on this topic there's a note in Peter Woit's blog: https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=13232 Points to another blog which attacks the "nightmare scenario": https://tritonstation.com/2022/11/29/the-angel-particle/ I don't particularly buy that a gravity-only…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter — HN submission

Sat, 19 Mar 2022 18:48:36 GMT

The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter — mentioned by politelemon

Fri, 18 Mar 2022 20:29:32 GMT

Found the paper, I think: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930 CPT = Charge, Parity, Time Does anyone know why "CPT" is written using a different font?

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The Big Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter — mentioned by nabla9

Wed, 09 Jan 2019 18:56:56 GMT

https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08928 https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08930 https://physicsworld.com/a/our-universe-has-antimatter-partn...

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.