<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Observations contradict galaxy size and surface brightness predictions that are based on the expanding universe hypothesis · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.08382/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.08382/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Observations contradict galaxy size and surface brightness predictions that are based on the expanding universe hypothesis — mentioned by medo-bear</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32476697</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1803.08382:32476697</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2022 23:05:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; He&amp;#x27;s not a serious researcher and has no published papers in astrophysics. according to wikipedia hes been funded by nasa. and also looks like youre incorrect about not being published https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08382&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.08382/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
