<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is the security of quantum cryptography guaranteed by the laws of physics? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.04520/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.04520/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Is the security of quantum cryptography guaranteed by the laws of physics? — mentioned by Tyyps</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47960030</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1803.04520:47960030</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:15:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;About QKD: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04520&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.04520/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Is the security of quantum cryptography guaranteed by the laws of physics? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23695687</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1803.04520:23695687</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 22:46:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;DJB: Is the security of quantum cryptography guaranteed by the laws of physics?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.04520/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Is the security of quantum cryptography guaranteed by the laws of physics? — mentioned by mtgx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20410694</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1803.04520:20410694</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:23:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;DJB and Tanja Lange believe that Quantum Key Distribution is snake oil cryptography not based on the &amp;quot;law of physics&amp;quot; as its proponents say it is: https://twitter.com/hashbreaker/status/689115480267816960 https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04520&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.04520/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Is the security of quantum cryptography guaranteed by the laws of physics? — mentioned by mtgx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17501803</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1803.04520:17501803</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:25:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a start (hint: they&amp;#x27;re not &amp;quot;unhackable&amp;quot; nor are they actually &amp;quot;guaranteed by the laws of physics&amp;quot;) https://twitter.com/hashbreaker/status/689115480267816960 https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04520&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.04520/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
