HackerPapers

arXiv:1803.03697cs.SI

Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web

Srijan Kumar, William L. Hamilton, Jure Leskovec, Dan Jurafsky

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Users organize themselves into communities on web platforms. These communities can interact with one another, often leading to conflicts and toxic interactions. However, little is known about the mechanisms of interactions between communities and how they impact users. Here we study intercommunity interactions across 36,000 communities on Reddit, examining cases where users of one community are mobilized by negative sentiment to comment in another community. We show that such conflicts tend to be initiated by a handful of communities---less than 1% of communities start 74% of conflicts. While conflicts tend to be initiated by highly active community members, they are carried out by significantly less active members. We find that conflicts are marked by formation of echo chambers, where users primarily talk to other users from their own community. In the long-term, conflicts have adverse effects and reduce the overall activity of users in the targeted communities. Our analysis of user interactions also suggests strategies for mitigating the negative impact of conflicts---such as increasing direct engagement between attackers and defenders. Further, we accurately predict whether a conflict will occur by creating a novel LSTM model that combines graph embeddings, user, community, and text features. This model can be used toreate early-warning systems for community moderators to prevent conflicts. Altogether, this work presents a data-driven view of community interactions and conflict, and paves the way towards healthier online communities.

arXiv comments
In WWW 2018: The Web Conference. Project website with data and code is https://snap.stanford.edu/conflict/
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1145/3178876.3186141
Subjects
cs.SISocial and Information Networks cs.CLComputation and Language cs.HCHuman-Computer Interaction

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 11 comments across 11 threads, from Aug 2022 to Feb 2025. Found in 2 HN submissions from Feb 2022 to Sep 2022. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments11 threads

    • I really think people can distinguish between a formal accusation and snark. Now, I agree that in febrile political environments it's better not to rely on sarcasm and satire for communication because it imposes extra cognitive overhead and is subject to misinterpretation, but…

      anigbrowlView on HNParent context

    • That doesn't work, because they just escalate or get other people to act out on their behalf. And really, why should we construct society around the behaviors the worst people? There is some evidence for the proposition that rude responses to provocations is in fact the most…

      anigbrowlView on HNParent context

    • Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03697 Humans display a reduced set of consistent behavioral phenotypes in dyadic games: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1600451 Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics…

      anigbrowlView on HNParent context

    • It does, and that's another opportunity to repost this evergreen paper describing how these issues manifest on Reddit. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03697

      anigbrowlView on HNParent context

    • That's because the 4chan/pol/ crowd are actively pushing into Twitter; for all practical purposes it's the biggest chan raid of all time, except that it's largely at the invitation of Twitter's owner. Once again linking this excellent paper on the dynamics of intergroup…

      anigbrowlView on HNParent context

    • Yeah, something like that. Also that if you serially abuse a service, you lose your privacy protections, for example your IP gets exposed/ I'm also a big fan of community-driven responses, but these require platform owners to give up some control in favor of being more…

      anigbrowlView on HNParent context

    • Reposting this paper yet again, to rub in the point that social media platforms play host to communities and communities are often very good at detecting interlopers and saboteurs and pushing them back out. And it turns out the most effective approach is to let people give bad…

      anigbrowlView on HNParent context

    • Coherent communities are surprisingly good at detecting malicious interlopers and simply giving them a hard time is a surprisingly effective tactic. This paper from the Stanford social media lab showcases some nice research on the dynamics of competitive forum raiding on Reddit…

      anigbrowlView on HNParent context

    • This is a long-running problem for HN, where civility is valued above integrity, incentivizing drive-by trolling because instigators are given the benefit of the doubt. There's evidence that uncivil responses to abusive incursions are better for the long-term health of a…

      anigbrowlView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.