<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Preeminence of Ethnic Diversity in Scientific Collaboration · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.02282/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.02282/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Preeminence of Ethnic Diversity in Scientific Collaboration — mentioned by milesvp</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45893255</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1803.02282:45893255</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 21:40:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m a little disappointed at the amount of me tooism in this thread. I think a lot of people here have maybe had really bad collaborative experiences. Maybe that&amp;#x27;s the default? most orgs are going to be bad at most things (tm). I can&amp;#x27;t help but think about this paper I ran across over a decade ago, that found a very high correlation between team diversity and paper citations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.02282 This one always stuck with me, partially because of personal biases, but also because it just seems so powerful to have access to different perspectives when trying to build something. I…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.02282/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DL</category></item></channel></rss>
