<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How to Start Training: The Effect of Initialization and Architecture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.01719/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.01719/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How to Start Training: The Effect of Initialization and Architecture — mentioned by SiempreViernes</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21653516</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1803.01719:21653516</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:12:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;re right about the central limit theorem appearing, but series expansions didn&amp;#x27;t appear; instead it is the fact that the weights are initialized to random values that seems to carry the day. I couldn&amp;#x27;t find any mention about a trained NN, this is strictly about the initial state. Yang does reference a few papers that supposedly leverage the GP correspondence to gain some insight about how to better initialize a NN, for example this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01719&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1803.01719/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
