<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Relativistic Entropy Inequality · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.07650/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.07650/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Relativistic Entropy Inequality — mentioned by foxes</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17944224</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1802.07650:17944224</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2018 03:38:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, yes that book doesn&amp;#x27;t mention that entropy is Lorentz invariant, but I think there are papers on it [0]. However it doesn&amp;#x27;t actually look like they reach a decisive conclusion - it is still for debate. [0] http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4470/38/13/00... [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.07650.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.07650/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
