<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comment on the Bekenstein bound · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.07184/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.07184/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comment on the Bekenstein bound — mentioned by consilient</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36671817</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1802.07184:36671817</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 19:37:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Exceeding the Bekenstein bound would mean having less-than-equilibrium free energy. See https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07184&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.07184/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
