Algorithmic improvements for the CIECAM02 and CAM16 color appearance models · HackerPapers discussions

Algorithmic improvements for the CIECAM02 and CAM16 color appearance models — mentioned by no_identd

Wed, 22 May 2019 17:50:42 GMT

Y'all might want to read this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06067 (Implementation: https://github.com/nschloe/colorio ) And this (read the Appendix on the BACKLIGHT of the Sharp Quattron, and take a look at Figures 1.3, 3.5, 9.2, G.3!): Note however, that all of this completely ignores the fact that humans seem capable of some form of HDR color fusion via binocular vision, as impressively demonstrated in this paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04392 Given that many people seem to report slight differences in monochromatic color differentiating between eyes, we can speculate that binocular vision…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Algorithmic improvements for the CIECAM02 and CAM16 color appearance models — mentioned by no_identd

Wed, 22 May 2019 17:33:16 GMT

That only takes us so far. First of all: Chrome still has broken color management. DisplayCAL has a way to generate profiles that look like garbage in applications which process color profiles incorrectly, and this happens with Chrome (but not Firefox.). Besides that, even if it had feature parity with Firefox, we'd still remain stuck in the land of ICC color profiles, and those have a few issues. I'd love to see web browsers support this modified version of this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06067 For which an implementation exists, here: https://github.com/nschloe/colorio …but no operating…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.