<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Web-Scale Responsive Visual Search at Bing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.04914/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.04914/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Web-Scale Responsive Visual Search at Bing — mentioned by simonw</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46384083</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1802.04914:46384083</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 12:43:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve not heard about Bing using vector search, at least outside of their image search feature https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04914 Information about how Bing text search works appears to be pretty sparse though. One of the great mysteries to me right now is how ChatGPT search actually works. It was Bing when they first launched it, but OpenAI have been investing a ton into their own search infrastructure since then. I can&amp;#x27;t figure out how much of it is Bing these days vs their own home-rolled system. What&amp;#x27;s confusing is how secretive OpenAI are about it! I would personally value it a whole lot…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.04914/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
