HackerPapers

arXiv:1802.02032cs.CL

Improving Variational Encoder-Decoders in Dialogue Generation

Xiaoyu Shen, Hui Su, Shuzi Niu, Vera Demberg

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Variational encoder-decoders (VEDs) have shown promising results in dialogue generation. However, the latent variable distributions are usually approximated by a much simpler model than the powerful RNN structure used for encoding and decoding, yielding the KL-vanishing problem and inconsistent training objective. In this paper, we separate the training step into two phases: The first phase learns to autoencode discrete texts into continuous embeddings, from which the second phase learns to generalize latent representations by reconstructing the encoded embedding. In this case, latent variables are sampled by transforming Gaussian noise through multi-layer perceptrons and are trained with a separate VED model, which has the potential of realizing a much more flexible distribution. We compare our model with current popular models and the experiment demonstrates substantial improvement in both metric-based and human evaluations.

arXiv comments
Accepted by AAAI2018
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Apr 2018 to Apr 2018. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

  • Show HN: Outputs from My Neural Conversational Model

    I trained a conversational model on my high-quality dataset. The underlying model is https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10960 which is open source on Github, with some additional techniques of my own on top of it. I then let it talk with itself for 30 turns for each dialogue. Here are the outputs with some minor post-processing for readability: https://pastebin.com/UsFEFqqh As you can see the results are very diverse and it seems like the model does capture the main topic discussed but fail to compose…

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.