<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Byte-Level Recursive Convolutional Auto-Encoder for Text · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.01817/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.01817/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Byte-Level Recursive Convolutional Auto-Encoder for Text — mentioned by posterboy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16446196</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1802.01817:16446196</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:36:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; That&amp;#x27;s like trying to prescribe some sort of attributes to language by looking at ASCII Which is a fruitful approach [1]. That said, I doubt everything else you wrote, too. I can&amp;#x27;t make sense of your comment. &amp;gt; The final point being, that if there actually was such a strong symbolic influence that it managed to survive thousands of years to make it to modern English, you wouldn&amp;#x27;t expect all these other forms to have also developed using the same rules that led to arm. I&amp;#x27;m not quite sure which &amp;quot;same rules that led to arm&amp;quot; you are talking about, but If you mean sound laws, then it is quite…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.01817/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
