<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architectures · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.01561/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.01561/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architectures — mentioned by heyitsguay</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17819694</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1802.01561:17819694</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:05:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Very misleading title about a very interesting development! A link to the actual paper is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01561. In less clickbaity terms, DeepMind has developed a scalable system for distributed training of certain types of reinforcement learning agents. They use that to train an agent to solve a pretty big collection of different reinforcement learning problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.01561/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architectures — mentioned by goolulusaurs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17185559</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1802.01561:17185559</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 06:37:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper is amazing, and exactly what I was thinking of posting in response to that part of the article. The amount of research Deepmind is putting out is astonishing, and even if you are paying attention it&amp;#x27;s hard to keep up with it all. Here are just a few papers I&amp;#x27;ve been looking at from the last few months, maybe none of them are advancements on the level of AlphaGo &amp;amp; Zero but they still show significant progress in a wide variety of areas. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.10542 https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07740 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0102-6 https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09401…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.01561/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architectures — mentioned by gwern</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16388804</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1802.01561:16388804</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 23:46:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;DRL is different from regular DL in that it tends towards CPU-heavy, not GPU-heavy. It&amp;#x27;s hard to saturate a single GPU/TPU since you&amp;#x27;re using tiny little NNs and only once in a while updating them based on long episodes through the environment. It might not be using GPUs/TPUs at all! If you look at the algorithm which that DM paper is based on, PPO, the original OpenAI paper &amp;amp; implementation (https://blog.openai.com/openai-baselines-ppo/) doesn&amp;#x27;t use GPUs, it&amp;#x27;s pure-CPU. (They have a second version which adds GPU support.) Or in a DM vein, look at their latest IMPALA which you might&amp;#x27;ve…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1802.01561/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
