HackerPapers

arXiv:1801.08287cs.AI

Directly Estimating the Variance of the λ-Return Using Temporal-Difference Methods

Craig Sherstan, Brendan Bennett, Kenny Young, Dylan R. Ashley, Adam White, Martha White, Richard S. Sutton

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

This paper investigates estimating the variance of a temporal-difference learning agent's update target. Most reinforcement learning methods use an estimate of the value function, which captures how good it is for the agent to be in a particular state and is mathematically expressed as the expected sum of discounted future rewards (called the return). These values can be straightforwardly estimated by averaging batches of returns using Monte Carlo methods. However, if we wish to update the agent's value estimates during learning--before terminal outcomes are observed--we must use a different estimation target called the λ-return, which truncates the return with the agent's own estimate of the value function. Temporal difference learning methods estimate the expected λ-return for each state, allowing these methods to update online and incrementally, and in most cases achieve better generalization error and faster learning than Monte Carlo methods. Naturally one could attempt to estimate higher-order moments of the λ-return. This paper is about estimating the variance of the λ-return. Prior work has shown that given estimates of the variance of the λ-return, learning systems can be constructed to (1) mitigate risk in action selection, and (2) automatically adapt the parameters of the learning process itself to improve performance. Unfortunately, existing methods for estimating the variance of the λ-return are complex and not well understood empirically. We contribute a method for estimating the variance of the λ-return directly using policy evaluation methods from reinforcement learning. Our approach is significantly simpler than prior methods that independently estimate the second moment of the λ-return. Empirically our new approach behaves at least as well as existing approaches, but is generally more robust.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Apr 2018 to Apr 2018.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Yes. In particular, it's possible to learn the variance of the return using TD-methods with the same computational complexity as learning the expected value (the value function). See [0] for how to do it via the squared TD-error, or [1] for how to estimate it via the second…

      clickokView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.