<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Internal Universes in Models of Homotopy Type Theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.07664/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.07664/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Internal Universes in Models of Homotopy Type Theory — mentioned by fmap</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18967392</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.07664:18967392</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:50:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Textbooks are usually supposed to be accessible to a wide audience so it makes sense when discussing foundations to start from a (hopefully) familiar set theory. It&amp;#x27;s usually a trade-off, since you end up repeating yourself when it comes to &amp;quot;internalized&amp;quot; constructions. &amp;quot;Sketches of an Elephant&amp;quot; is a good example of a textbook that pretty much presents everything twice. Once in an ambient set theory and once internally. What I meant specifically is work such as the following: Internal Universes in Models of Homotopy Type Theory - https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.07664 which explicitly works in an…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.07664/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
