<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Indication of anisotropy in arrival directions of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays through comparison to the flux pattern of extragalactic gamma-ray sources · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.06160/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.06160/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Indication of anisotropy in arrival directions of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays through comparison to the flux pattern of extragalactic gamma-ray sources — mentioned by smueller1234</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30329460</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.06160:30329460</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:02:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The state of the art observatory for ultra high energy cosmic rays is the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina (auger.org). Unfortunately the funds for building a 7x larger northern observatory in Colorado were scraped but the NSF during the crisis in 2008. :( The PAO published an article on the highest energy arrival directions in 2007 (https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.2843) and I was very sad that I wasn&amp;#x27;t on the author list (yet) at the time since I hadn&amp;#x27;t been around for a full year. The discovery was a correlation in arrival directions with the known location of supermassive black holes in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.06160/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.HE</category></item></channel></rss>
