<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The De Bruijn-Newman constant is non-negative · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.05914/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.05914/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The De Bruijn-Newman constant is non-negative — mentioned by japaget</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16188385</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.05914:16188385</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:15:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Preprint of paper in arxiv.org: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05914&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.05914/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item><item><title>The De Bruijn-Newman constant is non-negative — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16184656</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1801.05914:16184656</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 07:20:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Tao and Rodgers prove Newman&amp;#x27;s conjecture, one step closer to Riemann Hypothesis&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.05914/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
