<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inference · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.05507/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.05507/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inference — mentioned by advael</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40640008</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.05507:40640008</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:33:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m disappointed that they make the fundamental claim that their cloud service is private with respect to user inputs passed through it and don&amp;#x27;t even a little bit talk about how that&amp;#x27;s accomplished. Even just an explanation of what guarantees they make and how would be much more interesting than explanations of their flavor of RLHF or whatever nonsense. I read the GAZELLE* paper when it came out and wondered what it would look like if a large-scale organization tried to deploy something like it. Of course, Apple will never give adequate details about security mechanisms or privacy…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.05507/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inference — mentioned by testtest7777</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17509792</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.05507:17509792</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 19:51:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The authors should do a comparison with recent work on HE for inference on other model types. Logistic regression is a subset of neural network inference, and there is significant prior work that appears to be competitive with their results. Recent work [0] shows that MNIST, for example, can be done in a model secure/data secure way with online 30ms inference latency. For ~500,000 samples, evaluated sequentially, that&amp;#x27;s roughly 5 hours, which beats their time by about 3x. Perhaps I&amp;#x27;m missing details in my read of the paper. [0] Gazelle: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.05507/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
