<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Frame-Recurrent Video Super-Resolution · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.04590/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.04590/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Frame-Recurrent Video Super-Resolution — mentioned by fortran77</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22100174</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.04590:22100174</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:00:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes, if you have multiple shots where the subject hasn&amp;#x27;t moved much, you can combine them to get accurate subpixel resolution (i.e., resolution higher than the camera has). However, this works best to subjects that are &amp;quot;fixed&amp;quot; like license plates. Here&amp;#x27;s a &amp;quot;practical&amp;quot; way to do it: https://www.dpreview.com/articles/0727694641/here-s-how-to-p... And here&amp;#x27;s an example of a research paper about it: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.04590.pdf The local police will spend no time and effort on it. And any video you produce/enhance will not be able to be used as evidence by them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.04590/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Frame-Recurrent Video Super-Resolution — mentioned by logicallee</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17390352</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.04590:17390352</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:36:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps I was naive about the state of the art. After the now-dead reply I received, I searched, and found a couple of papers like this https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04590 - &amp;quot;Frame-Recurrent Video Super-Resolution&amp;quot; but if you look at p. 8, I think many of the algorithms still wouldn&amp;#x27;t end up with readable text. This paper is from this year, so it is an area of active research. I wrote a quick mail to the authors to see if they would put the video through their setup (since the last paper update was just 3 months ago) and share their results. 2. Trying it myself... After my downvotes I tried this…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.04590/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
