<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Scale-free networks are rare · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.03400/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.03400/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Scale-free networks are rare — mentioned by davex32</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18208169</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.03400:18208169</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2018 14:45:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Nice piece of work. The role of influencers in this study is akin to that of hubs in scale-free network. Diffusion on scale-free and small-world network have been studied extensively in physics community. It will be interesting to compare the results from this paper with work on scale-free networks. Also, context is everything. A social graph is not a flat structure. This work, for instance, https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.03826, shows that how consensus is formed and spreads across an agent population depends heavily on how different network types overlap. I also remembered this work on how…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.03400/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item><item><title>Scale-free networks are rare — mentioned by transcranial</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17204803</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.03400:17204803</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 12:54:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a recent follow-up paper [1] testing exactly that on many diverse datasets, positing that scale-free (power-law distributed) networks are actually not that common in the real world. Quanta has a nice article about it [2]. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03400 [2] https://www.quantamagazine.org/scant-evidence-of-power-laws-...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.03400/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item><item><title>Scale-free networks are rare — mentioned by drallison</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16414536</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.03400:16414536</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:17:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Power laws and scale-free networks are discussed in https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03400 with HN comments at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16144867. Both this and the cited paper are worthwhile reads for power law users.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.03400/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item><item><title>Scale-free networks are rare — mentioned by yarapavan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16392506</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.03400:16392506</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:26:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A central claim in modern network science is that real-world networks are typically &amp;quot;scale free,&amp;quot; meaning that the fraction of nodes with degree k follows a power law, decaying like k−α, often with 2&amp;lt;α&amp;lt;3. However, empirical evidence for this belief derives from a relatively small number of real-world networks. We test the universality of scale-free structure by applying state-of-the-art statistical tools to a large corpus of nearly 1000 network data sets drawn from social, biological, technological, and informational sources. We fit the power-law model to each degree distribution, test its…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.03400/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item><item><title>Scale-free networks are rare — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16144867</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1801.03400:16144867</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:24:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Scale-Free Networks Are Rare&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 2 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.03400/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
