<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Towards co-evolution of fitness predictors and Deep Neural Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.00119/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.00119/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Towards co-evolution of fitness predictors and Deep Neural Networks — mentioned by pkoperek</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29328445</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1801.00119:29328445</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:52:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Apart from NEAT/HyperNEAT there are also other approaches to neuroevolution (I think in this context it is referred to as &amp;quot;Evolutionary Neural Architecture Search&amp;quot; [0]). Evolution in general can be applied in different ways (e.g. optimizing the architecture, replacing training gradient descent etc.). A while ago I co-authored a paper in this space [1] and released some code for interested folks [2]. [0]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.10937.pdf [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00119 [2]: https://gitlab.com/pkoperek/pytorch-dnn-evolution/-/tree/mas...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1801.00119/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item></channel></rss>
