<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On quality of implementation of Fortran 2008 complex intrinsic functions on branch cuts · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.10230/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.10230/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On quality of implementation of Fortran 2008 complex intrinsic functions on branch cuts — mentioned by Bostonian</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29708745</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1712.10230:29708745</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:30:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Fortran has built-in complex numbers and complex-valued functions, so similar issues arise. There was a paper by Anton Shterenlikht, &amp;quot;On quality of implementation of Fortran 2008 complex intrinsic functions on branch cuts&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.10230 .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.10230/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.MS</category></item></channel></rss>
