https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.09678/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26508767urn:hackerpapers:mention:1712.09678:26508767Thu, 18 Mar 2021 23:40:49 GMT<p>Ad hominem attacks, especially in mathematics should not stand but still I would give a heads up to laypeople: be very very cautious about just accepting this until further reviews are done because this is not the first time he submitted a paper with absolutely bombastic results which has been proven flawed. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09678 is withdrawn and https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03837 is still being revised and from what I read about the latter the chances of it being salvaged is very low. Here&#x27;s one of the easiest to understand comments about it: &gt; I have attempted to read through the…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.09678/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>math.LOhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16031601urn:hackerpapers:submission:1712.09678:16031601Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:59:57 GMT<p>The choiceless cardinals are inconsistent</p><p></p><p>1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.09678/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>math.LO