HackerPapers

arXiv:1712.07962physics.gen-ph

A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Negative Masses and Matter Creation within a Modified $Λ$CDM Framework

J. S. Farnes

Abstract

Dark energy and dark matter constitute 95% of the observable Universe. Yet the physical nature of these two phenomena remains a mystery. Einstein suggested a long-forgotten solution: gravitationally repulsive negative masses, which drive cosmic expansion and cannot coalesce into light-emitting structures. However, contemporary cosmological results are derived upon the reasonable assumption that the Universe only contains positive masses. By reconsidering this assumption, I have constructed a toy model which suggests that both dark phenomena can be unified into a single negative mass fluid. The model is a modified $Λ$CDM cosmology, and indicates that continuously-created negative masses can resemble the cosmological constant and can flatten the rotation curves of galaxies. The model leads to a cyclic universe with a time-variable Hubble parameter, potentially providing compatibility with the current tension that is emerging in cosmological measurements. In the first three-dimensional N-body simulations of negative mass matter in the scientific literature, this exotic material naturally forms haloes around galaxies that extend to several galactic radii. These haloes are not cuspy. The proposed cosmological model is therefore able to predict the observed distribution of dark matter in galaxies from first principles. The model makes several testable predictions and seems to have the potential to be consistent with observational evidence from distant supernovae, the cosmic microwave background, and galaxy clusters. These findings may imply that negative masses are a real and physical aspect of our Universe, or alternatively may imply the existence of a superseding theory that in some limit can be modelled by effective negative masses. Both cases lead to the surprising conclusion that the compelling puzzle of the dark Universe may have been due to a simple sign error.

arXiv comments
Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics (A&A). Videos of the simulations are available online at: https://goo.gl/rZN1Ps
Journal reference
A&A 620, A92 (2018)
DOI
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832898
Subjects
physics.gen-phGeneral Physics astro-ph.COCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics astro-ph.GAAstrophysics of Galaxies gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

On Hacker News

Linked by 4 identifiable commenters in 4 comments across 1 thread, from Dec 2018 to Dec 2018. Found in 1 HN submission from Oct 2019 to Oct 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.07962.pdf Not a physicist, but my summary of the author's point would be: If you allow for matter with a negative mass and plug it into a n-body simulation. You seem to get what looks like dark matter from first principles. Namely, a halo of non…

      galadranView on HNParent context

    • Please post links to the arXiv abstract pages, everyone: we don't always want to download a PDF just to read the abstract! https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07962 Edit to add: the abstract pages also often contain useful extra information, such as (in this case) a link to YouTube…

      autopoiesisView on HNParent context

    • That's what the article (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.07962.pdf) says: > In theories of quantum gravity, gravitation is mediated by the graviton – a massless, spin-2, boson. This means that any pair of negative masses would attract, and not repel as suggested in this theory.…

      FabHKView on HNParent context

    • Physics is highly mathematical and as such, can indeed be "tested" (i.e. proven) to be consistent with mathematical laws. This is fairly straightforward (for suitably mathematically literate people). The real issues are: 1. can the theory make testable predictions that can be…

      phs318uView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.