https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.05627/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17144468urn:hackerpapers:mention:1712.05627:17144468Thu, 24 May 2018 14:46:49 GMT<p>How does this tool compare to other (libre) anonymization software programs, such as ARX [1]? From what I understand, there are only basic routines so to sample records and coarsen a few attributes (e.g. ZIP code, dates) implemented so far. This might also not be sufficient to truly anonymize data, as a large body of research has shown so far [2,3,4] [1] https://arx.deidentifier.org [2] https://www.uclalawreview.org/pdf/57-6-3.pdf [3] http://randomwalker.info/publications/no-silver-bullet-de-id... [4] http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.05627</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.05627/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CYhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15949116urn:hackerpapers:mention:1712.05627:15949116Mon, 18 Dec 2017 03:10:18 GMT<p>Research for those interested: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.05627</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.05627/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CY