<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Selective Jamming of LoRaWAN using Commodity Hardware · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.02141/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.02141/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Selective Jamming of LoRaWAN using Commodity Hardware — mentioned by dbrgn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18890193</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1712.02141:18890193</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:34:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;In general LoRa (and LoRaWan) are designed to be very resilient against interference, but targeted jamming seems possible: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.02141.pdf On the other hand, jamming is possible for most radio protocols. I&amp;#x27;m pretty sure it&amp;#x27;s illegal though, even in the license free band. And LoRaWan in standard mode is inherently unreliable (unconfirmed packages by default). Using it for &amp;quot;passive&amp;quot; logging is fine, using it for critical &amp;quot;active&amp;quot; remote control maybe less so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.02141/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NI</category></item><item><title>Selective Jamming of LoRaWAN using Commodity Hardware — mentioned by friesen</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17618458</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1712.02141:17618458</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:57:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;While I can get behind many of the use cases for FOAM&amp;#x27;s proposed product, avoiding interference isn&amp;#x27;t one of them. LoRa is particularly susceptible to jamming. Given the frequencies used, accidental jamming by legally operating transmitters is a very real possibility. It also turns out that LoRaWAN is vulnerable to selective jamming, but I&amp;#x27;m not sure whether or not FOAM is looking to make use of the LoRaWAN layer. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.02141&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.02141/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NI</category></item></channel></rss>
