<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask? (short version) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.01816/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.01816/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask? (short version) — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21512994</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1712.01816:21512994</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:19:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.01816/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask? (short version) — mentioned by akvadrako</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16799419</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1712.01816:16799419</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 06:18:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I have looked into this somewhat deeply and he might have a point, but it&amp;#x27;s a bit subtle. First, current computers are not powerful enough to show him wrong. Second, the Many Worlds interpretation of QM is both deterministic and quantum, and since Jurgen is assuming his super-program creates a multiverse anyway, it&amp;#x27;s a logical next step. The meat of Jurgen&amp;#x27;s proposal is that &amp;quot;fast&amp;quot; programs are more likely (which makes sense, IMHO) and quantum universes are too wasteful computationally (which seems less obvious). If you want to read more along these lines, I can recommend something quite…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1712.01816/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
