Progressive Neural Architecture Search · HackerPapers discussions

Progressive Neural Architecture Search — HN submission

Fri, 03 Aug 2018 18:05:45 GMT

Progressive Neural Architecture Search

45 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Progressive Neural Architecture Search — mentioned by TheIronYuppie

Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:28:53 GMT

Disclosure: I work at Google at Kubeflow There are a few different reasons: 1) Most companies have very limited skill in building advanced models. While many folks are trying to achieve 5% or better accuracy, MOST folks are trying to achieve ANY accuracy (since they have nothing) 2) Many problems are not very complicated and do not require a custom model. From the blog post, the "cloud" example only requires a small amount of changes to classify for a specific domain - to have to build an entirely new model for that, or train on MM of images seems like overkill 3) AutoML (often) is better…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Progressive Neural Architecture Search — mentioned by TheIronYuppie

Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:25:14 GMT

Disclosure: I work at Google on Kubeflow Correct, it's a cloud service, based on the research Google published for model exploration[1][2]. There are research examples today where this service provided better models than humans were able to achieve by hand or with genetic algorithms (models trained faster and/or with better error rates)[3] [1] https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.c... [2] https://blog.acolyer.org/2017/10/02/google-vizier-a-service-... [3] https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00559

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.