https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11237/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28341984urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.11237:28341984Sat, 28 Aug 2021 22:14:21 GMT<p>Crawford addresses what you&#x27;re saying in this paper. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11237</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11237/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>astro-ph.COhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28327591urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.11237:28327591Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:33:08 GMT<p>What if I could rebut all the rebuttals? - The analysis of supernovae light curves is calibrated in a way that presumes galactic recession. More detail here https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11237. - The 2.7 K cosmic background radiation is consistent with non-expansionary, non-big-bang models. Cosmic temperature was predicted 50 years before Penzias and Wilson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background#Ti... - The mechanism for photon energy loss (can we call this &quot;photon hubbling&quot;?) is not scattering by free electrons. I speculate it is the cost of traveling, of a photon forging…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11237/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>astro-ph.COhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28327584urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.11237:28327584Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:32:50 GMT<p>What if I could rebut all the rebuttals? - The analysis of supernovae light curves is calibrated in a way that presumes galactic recession. More detail here https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11237. - The 2.7 K cosmic background radiation is consistent with non-expansionary, non-big-bang models. Cosmic temperature was predicted 50 years before Penzias and Wilson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background#Ti... - The mechanism for photon energy loss (can we call this &quot;photon hubbling&quot;?) is not scattering by free electrons. I speculate it is the cost of traveling, of a photon forging…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11237/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>astro-ph.COhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28327574urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.11237:28327574Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:32:08 GMT<p>What if I could rebut all the rebuttals? - The analysis of supernovae light curves is calibrated in a way that presumes galactic recession. More detail here https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11237. - The 2.7 K cosmic background radiation is consistent with non-expansionary, non-big-bang models. Cosmic temperature was predicted 50 years before Penzias and Wilson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background#Ti... - The mechanism for photon energy loss (can we call this &quot;photon hubbling&quot;?) is not scattering by free electrons. I speculate it is the cost of traveling, of a photon forging…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11237/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>astro-ph.CO