<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Multi-Horizon Quantile Recurrent Forecaster · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11053/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11053/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Multi-Horizon Quantile Recurrent Forecaster — mentioned by jwilber</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33963800</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.11053:33963800</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 02:16:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I appreciate the response but I admit I&amp;#x27;m a bit confused - maybe it&amp;#x27;s the case that you&amp;#x27;re not familiar with the need for modern forecasting? Some of your &amp;#x27;defense&amp;#x27; is just flat out wrong. A few points: - You write: 1. &amp;quot;Clean data would benefit most models, not just non-deep learning models. Missing data introduces bias even in DL models.&amp;quot; and 2. &amp;quot;Because a cold start is not a time series data set. Why would time series methods work on non time series data.&amp;quot; Clean data is good, yes, thanks for the insight. But 1. missing data is a huge issue for model quality, particularly for…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11053/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item><item><title>A Multi-Horizon Quantile Recurrent Forecaster — mentioned by lr1970</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27698700</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.11053:27698700</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 13:07:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Do you have any favourite libraries for producing such? For modern Deep Learning based probabilistic forecasting you can try DeepAR with parametric likelihood function [0] or Multi-Horizon Quantile RNN (non-parametric) [1]. The implementations of these models in Pytorch and MXnet are scattered all over the place. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04110 [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11053 EDIT: formatting&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11053/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item><item><title>A Multi-Horizon Quantile Recurrent Forecaster — mentioned by solidasparagus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21531063</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.11053:21531063</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:41:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely disagree with the assumption that because something has been done for 60+ years it won&amp;#x27;t be improved by new, extremely relevant technologies. Amazon is very effective at both OR and organizational dynamics, but they found massive savings by using ML to predict demand and thus inventory/costs (Research is here - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.11053.pdf).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.11053/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
