<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Improved Techniques for Preparing Eigenstates of Fermionic Hamiltonians · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.10460/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.10460/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Improved Techniques for Preparing Eigenstates of Fermionic Hamiltonians — mentioned by Strilanc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41186617</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.10460:41186617</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 23:36:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No, that&amp;#x27;s not true at all. For example, a chemistry simulation can be done in first quantization; where the state is a list of superposed 2s-complement integers indicating the positions of the electrons (as opposed to a more direct one-qubit=one-position mapping). And the list is initialized in a way that satisfies the Pauli exclusion principle by using a sorting network [1]. This is presumably not at all how Nature does it. Another example is factoring. Shor&amp;#x27;s factoring algorithm is not at all like behaving analogous to a physical system. It&amp;#x27;s about modular exponentiation and Fourier…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.10460/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
