HackerPapers

arXiv:1711.09883cs.LG

AI Safety Gridworlds

Jan Leike, Miljan Martic, Victoria Krakovna, Pedro A. Ortega, Tom Everitt, Andrew Lefrancq, Laurent Orseau, Shane Legg

Abstract

We present a suite of reinforcement learning environments illustrating various safety properties of intelligent agents. These problems include safe interruptibility, avoiding side effects, absent supervisor, reward gaming, safe exploration, as well as robustness to self-modification, distributional shift, and adversaries. To measure compliance with the intended safe behavior, we equip each environment with a performance function that is hidden from the agent. This allows us to categorize AI safety problems into robustness and specification problems, depending on whether the performance function corresponds to the observed reward function. We evaluate A2C and Rainbow, two recent deep reinforcement learning agents, on our environments and show that they are not able to solve them satisfactorily.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Nov 2019 to Jun 2023. Found in 1 HN submission from Feb 2018 to Feb 2018. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • > While the retraction (they later stated that this was a thought experiment and NOT a simulation) may or may not be true, the current state of AI would suggest that this kind of chain-of-logic problem-solving is likely out of reach. No, it's not. It's a predictable & expected…

      gwernView on HNParent context

  1. Safety Gym 1 comment

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.