<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mathematics of Isogeny Based Cryptography · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.04062/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.04062/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Mathematics of Isogeny Based Cryptography — mentioned by throwawaymath</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17765974</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.04062:17765974</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 13:48:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish I had known about this when I was writing my dissertation. This looks reasonably complete for a lot of the mathematical diagrams in cryptography. It would be nice if the supersingular isogeny support included more diagrams than just the Diffie Hellman key exchange protocol, but they’re a relatively recent are of study so it makes sense. But there are a lot of isogeny diagrams (such as endomorphisms, volcanoes and random walks) beyond SIDH. For example, Luca De Feo’s 2017 article on isogeny mathematics in cryptography [1] (pages 10,11,13,18,21,27,28,32,35) and the 2011 Feo-Jao-Plut…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.04062/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
