HackerPapers

arXiv:1711.03683eess.SP

Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink

Imtiaz Nasim, Seungmo Kim

Abstract

While cellular communications in millimeter wave (mmW) bands have been attracting significant research interest, their potential harmful impacts on human health are not as significantly studied. Prior research on human exposure to radio frequency (RF) fields in a cellular communications system has been focused on uplink only due to the closer physical contact of a transmitter to a human body. However, this paper claims the necessity of thorough investigation on human exposure to downlink RF fields, as cellular systems deployed in mmW bands will entail (i) deployment of more transmitters due to smaller cell size and (ii) higher concentration of RF energy using a highly directional antenna. In this paper, we present human RF exposure levels in downlink of a Fifth Generation Wireless Systems (5G). Our results show that 5G downlink RF fields generate significantly higher power density (PD) and specific absorption rate (SAR) than a current cellular system. This paper also shows that SAR should also be taken into account for determining human RF exposure in the mmW downlink.

arXiv comments
Submitted to IEEE International Communications Conference (ICC)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
eess.SPSignal Processing

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 2 threads, from May 2019 to Jun 2020. Found in 1 HN submission from Mar 2019 to Mar 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

  1. 5G is perfectly fine 2 comments
    • MM-waves used for 5C also work via VGCC activation. 5C is designed to carry extraordinarily high amounts of information per second and is, therefore, extraordinarily highly pulsed. The electrical parts of these MM-waves do not penetrate well into buildings, such that millions of…

      looneytunes6651View on HNParent context

    • It looks like your link is broken. Is this the preprint you're referring to? "Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink" Imtiaz Nasim, Seungmo Kim https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03683

      jzebedeeView on HNParent context

    • No, that's just what people who believe in conspiracies (like "everything is Russian propaganda") believe. Except if you consider the "US department of health" as Russian agents: "The NTP studies found that high exposure to RFR used by cell phones was associated with: Clear…

      coldteaView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.