<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quaternion kinematics for the error-state Kalman filter · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.02508/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.02508/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quaternion kinematics for the error-state Kalman filter — mentioned by thermistokles</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29515386</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.02508:29515386</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2021 20:59:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There are actually even more. You can actually have 12 different variations depending on certain choices. Though the other sources of differences are minor. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.02508 This is actually a great source of frustration in the robotics state estimation community, as you have the influential University of Minnesota using JPL, and most other universities using Hamiltonian.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.02508/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.RO</category></item></channel></rss>
