<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Magnitude homology of enriched categories and metric spaces · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00802/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00802/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Magnitude homology of enriched categories and metric spaces — mentioned by autopoiesis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36839262</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.00802:36839262</guid><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2023 20:07:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s not clear what you&amp;#x27;re seeking. Probabilities appear because the magnitude of a space is a way of &amp;#x27;measuring&amp;#x27; it -- and thus magnitude is closely related to entropy. Of course, you can follow your nose and find your way beyond mere spaces, and this may lead you to the notion of &amp;#x27;magnitude homology&amp;#x27; [1]. But it&amp;#x27;s not clear that this generalization is the best way to introduce the idea of magnitude to ecology. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00802&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.AT</category></item></channel></rss>
