<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ALMA Discovery of Dust Belts Around Proxima Centauri · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00578/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00578/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>ALMA Discovery of Dust Belts Around Proxima Centauri — mentioned by kwoff</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16666644</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.00578:16666644</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 14:08:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The web page links to a journal article that you have to pay for, but you can find the freely-readable version of the full article at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08257 . Section 4.2 discusses dust emission. The original paper they&amp;#x27;re correcting is at https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00578 (section 3.2). This paper concludes that the previous paper had wrong assumptions because a flare happened during their measurement, so they didn&amp;#x27;t need to hypothesize that there is a dust belt (at least the 2 inner ones; they didn&amp;#x27;t have info about the far outer belt) to account for the supposed &amp;quot;excess emission&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00578/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
