<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Snow Queen is Evil and Beautiful: Experimental Evidence for Probabilistic Contextuality in Human Choices · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00418/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00418/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Snow Queen is Evil and Beautiful: Experimental Evidence for Probabilistic Contextuality in Human Choices — mentioned by akvadrako</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17660253</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.00418:17660253</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 07:03:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Some human behavior is more naturally modelled in QT than classical probability theory.¹ The major difference between quantum and classical is that you can have incompatible variables which don&amp;#x27;t have a shared probability space. Nothing to do with physics. Also, with natural units Plank&amp;#x27;s constant is 2π, so it does show up a lot. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.00418.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00418/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-bio.NC</category></item></channel></rss>
