<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fast Dynamic Arrays · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00275/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00275/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fast Dynamic Arrays — mentioned by meuk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20874705</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.00275:20874705</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 07:10:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is cool. I wanted to comment on the necessity of knowing the approximate size of N a priori, but this is very clearly stated on the github page. Interesting alternatives that also support insertion, deletion, and lookup (is there a name for this interface?) are AVL trees and hash tables. As described in https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.00275.pdf, tiered vectors can be improved further: &amp;quot;We present a highly optimized implementation of tiered vectors, a data structure for maintaining a sequence of n elements supporting access in time O(1) and insertion and deletion in time O(n^ε) for ε &amp;gt; 0 while…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00275/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
