<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Replace or Retrieve Keywords In Documents at Scale · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00046/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00046/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Replace or Retrieve Keywords In Documents at Scale — mentioned by lefttoreader</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37127291</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1711.00046:37127291</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 21:55:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The “trick” seems to blatantly rip off FlashText without citing it? https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.00046.pdf I’m a fan of the approach. I normally wouldn’t care if this was just another LLM library taking inspiration, but if you’re going to go out of your way to put a paper on the ArXiv, feels like doing a literature review is a good step?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1711.00046/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
