arXiv:1710.11606math.OC
Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points I
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
We prove lower bounds on the complexity of finding $ε$-stationary points (points $x$ such that $\|\nabla f(x)\| \le ε$) of smooth, high-dimensional, and potentially non-convex functions $f$. We consider oracle-based complexity measures, where an algorithm is given access to the value and all derivatives of $f$ at a query point $x$. We show that for any (potentially randomized) algorithm $\mathsf{A}$, there exists a function $f$ with Lipschitz $p$th order derivatives such that $\mathsf{A}$ requires at least $ε^{-(p+1)/p}$ queries to find an $ε$-stationary point. Our lower bounds are sharp to within constants, and they show that gradient descent, cubic-regularized Newton's method, and generalized $p$th order regularization are worst-case optimal within their natural function classes.
Depending on the level you're looking for, I'm always a huge fan of Rockafellar [0] for the more mathematical expositions (they're lovely, clear, and very well thought through). Even in this case, though, subgradients may not exist (they're only guaranteed to exist for convex…
LolWolfView on HNParent context