<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Implicit Causal Models for Genome-wide Association Studies · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1710.10742/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1710.10742/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Implicit Causal Models for Genome-wide Association Studies — mentioned by ml_thoughts</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17108411</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1710.10742:17108411</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2018 16:00:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Worth noting that there has been a fair bit of good research in causal machine learning in the last year or so, for example &amp;quot;Implicit Causal Models for Genome-wide Association Studies&amp;quot; (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.10742.pdf). The key point of this paper is that neural networks really are very good at &amp;quot;curve fitting&amp;quot; and that this curve fitting in the context of variational inference has advantages for causal reasoning, too. Neural networks can be used in a variety of structures, and these structures tend to benefit from the inclusion of powerful trainable non-linear function approximators. In…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1710.10742/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
