<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SGD Learns Over-parameterized Networks that Provably Generalize on Linearly Separable Data · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1710.10174/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1710.10174/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SGD Learns Over-parameterized Networks that Provably Generalize on Linearly Separable Data — mentioned by stochastic_monk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15683904</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1710.10174:15683904</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 02:51:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;re correct. Boosting was directly formulated in the PAC framework. (Source: http://l2r.cs.uiuc.edu/Teaching/CS446-17/LectureNotesNew/boo... &amp;quot;The original boosting algorithm was proposed as an answer to a theoretical question in PAC learning [The Strength of Weak Learnability; Schapire, 89.]&amp;quot;) It took a while, but there&amp;#x27;s been a lot of work lately explaining neural nets&amp;#x27; performance over the last 5 years of so, from papers showing PAC learnability for specific architectures (https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10174) to work saying that most local optima are close to global optima…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1710.10174/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
