<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1710.05835/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1710.05835/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant — mentioned by ncmncm</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19783058</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1710.05835:19783058</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 22:09:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No, it wasn&amp;#x27;t in the article, because it wasn&amp;#x27;t relevant, except as independent confirmation that both are in the ballpark. I just gurgled LIGO and Hubble relation, and up popped https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05835.pdf and &amp;#x27;Dr Stephen Feeney of the Center for Computational Astrophysics at the Flatiron Institute in New York City, “We should be able to detect enough mergers to answer this question within 5-10 years.”&amp;#x27;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1710.05835/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
